In any education system, the primary focus must always be the child. Much has been said about ‘child-centered’ education, but what does it truly entail? Unfortunately, it is often left to the discretion of individual teachers to interpret and implement, leading to varied experiences for students. Each year, children navigate through multiple teachers, each with their own approaches and expectations, often receiving mixed signals in the process.
Recently, a Class X student called me to ask who was preparing the Social Science question paper. Since three teachers, including myself, handled the subject, I was intrigued by the question. I asked why it mattered, and the student promptly replied, “If you are setting the paper, I expect more value-based and personality-related questions.” His response made me reflect on how students perceive and adapt to their teachers. To ensure fairness, I disclosed the question paper details to all students, preventing any advantage or speculation.
Each teacher conveys different messages—sometimes unconsciously—within the school environment. Some are friendly and lenient, while others are strict. Some favor boys, others favor girls. Some conduct surprise tests; others do not. When extra classes are scheduled, subjects like physical education and music are often sacrificed. Some teachers allow latecomers without question, while others demand explanations and even reprimand students publicly. Some emphasize marks and grades, whereas others prioritize skills and socialization. Inconsistent expectations can leave students confused and anxious.
This inconsistency extends beyond academics. Some teachers permit students to open textbooks, while others discourage it. Some distribute chocolates, while others do not. Certain teachers have favorite students, while those with special needs are sometimes overlooked. Classroom discipline also varies—some teachers manage situations independently, while others resort to sending students to the principal at the first sign of trouble. These varying approaches often place children in difficult and conflicting situations.
For students, this lack of uniformity fosters uncertainty. Some struggle to adapt, while others become adept at manipulation. This inconsistency, though often unintentional, creates an environment where insecurity, fear, and even hypocrisy can take root.
What children truly need is a school culture that is morally and ethically fair, consistent, and integrated—while still respecting teachers' individuality. They require teachers who are firm, not simply strict or lenient. A recent survey in my school revealed that students felt most comfortable with teachers who were consistently firm with all students, rather than those who were selectively lenient or strict. This sends a clear message: fairness is valued above all.
The ideal teacher is one who is firm yet reflective, accountable for their actions, and thoughtful in their approach. When teachers blend empathy and compassion with fairness, they create an environment where students feel secure, respected, and motivated to learn. After all, what more could a student ask for than a teacher who guides with integrity and care?
Comments
Post a Comment